Thursday, November 24, 2011
A mile away from Bailey Elementary, a possible solution
When I first came across this image of a roundabout with dedicated tunnels for bikes and pedestrians, I thought I had somehow wandered onto David Hembrow's blog about cycling in the Netherlands, but no, it turns out this is an image of an American roundabout. A Minnesotan roundabout. A Woodburian roundabout.
A roundabout in Woodbury? With two lanes, bike paths, and tunnels? Yep.
A few weeks ago, Mike Spack linked to an online presentation by Joe Gustafson of Washington County Public Works that covered the project. It's the first fully two-lane roundabout in the state, so the county used it to experiment a bit and collected extra data about its performance—hence the reason for the presentation.
However, the main thing that jumped at me was the roundabout's location: It's at the intersection of Radio Drive and Bailey Road. You might remember Bailey Road from news stories earlier this year about Gordon Bailey Elementary School. It became a cause célèbre for Minnesota urbanists after it was reported that of the 620 students, none of them walked or rode bicycles to school.
15 miles per hour, while others were normally 30 but restricted to 20 mph when students were present.
Because I grew up with a school on a slow street, I'm always amazed to see schools such as Bailey placed next to 55-mph suburban arterials. Unfortunately, it has been a common practice in the United States for the past few decades.
Roads such as this can be deadly for students. For me, this reality came into stark relief when I was in high school—a student in nearby Kasson was killed crossing the 40-mph Mantorville Avenue (Minnesota State Highway 57) near that city's high school. He was hit fast enough to be lifted out of his shoes—the mental image of empty sneakers marking a crash victim's last footsteps is something that always sticks with me.
Due to my own experiences, I'm inclined to think that parents and kids feel unsafe crossing Bailey Road, and that's why every student gets driven or bused to school. In the original reporting on the subject, parents gave a variety of reasons for driving their children, but the school's location still sticks out like a sore thumb.
So, how do you make this road—out on the edge of the urban boundary—feel safe? Ideally, I'd like to see schools located in town centers, like the elementary I grew up with. Built up near the edge of streets that are designed to be slow, even if the slow area only lasts a block or so.
In this case, it seems the best option is to completely separate pedestrian traffic from the road, allowing people to get from one side to the other without having to wait for cars to pass or stop.
Tunnels or bridges across the road are the way to accomplish that. Expensive solutions, but worth the money because they will save lives. Certainly criticism would follow any such proposals, but critics should also recognize that they are usually remedies to problems that never should have existed in the first place. Unwalkable locations bring latent costs with them, and building special grade-separated walkways just makes those hidden costs visible.
Schools should be built in walkable places, period. They are engines of community, and should be treated as such.